A Flaw in Judgment at UFC 86?
Monday, July 7th, 2008
Any time a fight has to be decided by an objective third party, the decision will always be subject to scrutiny. When both fighters are left standing, it is up to a set of judges to intervene. For the most part, that system has worked fairly well in the world of mma. However, Ben Fowlkes of Sports Illustrated disagrees. In an article published Monday afternoon, Fowlkes feels that the Griffin-Jackson decision is one more piece of evidence that depicts the judging flaws in the world of mixed martial arts.
Fowlkes contends that Griffin’s face looked as though he took the brunt of the beating. However, one or two good shots can leave quite a nasty imprint on a fighter’s face. Over the course of a championship match, there are twenty-five minutes of hard-hitting action. That translates into both fighters landing quite a significant amount of blows to one another. Simply because Griffin wore more badges of brutality doesn’t shouldn’t discredit him from a victory.
Fowlkes goes on to compare mma judging too much like that of boxing. Yet, there are significantly more disputed boxing matches than there are in the world of mma. Following the fight, Jackson himself admitted that “he got whooped”. If Jackson can see that then why can’t everyone else?


MMA Crunch is dedicated to bringing you the hardest hitting MMA coverage around.










